One More Geological Clue Still Pending; “The Obsidian of the Land of Punt”

By: Mahmoud A. Emam

Teaching Assistant, Institute of African Studies and Research, Cairo University.

Mahmoud.emam@cu.edu.eg

All the copyrights for the registered letter belong to the authors – This is not a published letter yet, the authors need to address the comments by the readers before the publication.

From the Old Kingdom (c. 2575–2150 BC) onwards, Punt is frequently recorded in Egyptian royal, private, religious and literary texts as a geographical region from which frankincense and other exotic products were imported as well as a mythical place from which marvelous things came to Egypt. Egypt relationship to the Land of Punt was based on commercial interests. Such trading contacts are attested by commemorative stelae, tomb reliefs, and most notably by the reliefs in Queen Hatshepsut’s mortuary temple at Deir El-Bahri.

The location of Punt and its routes from Egypt have been debated for more than a century, because the Egyptian textual and representational evidence only provides a general picture of Punt. Many different hypotheses have been advanced by Egyptologists to locate Punt in specific geographical regions. Arabia, Somalia, Mozambique, Sudan, Uganda, Ethiopia and Eritrea, all of these places and others have been suggested at one time or another. But recently a collection of additional archaeological, anthropological, geographical, botanical and zoological evidence assist in locating Punt on African coast in the northern Horn of Africa (i.e. northern Ethiopia and Eritrea; Fig. 1). However, in point of view, the geological evidence still pending.

Wadi Gawasis (Fig.1) on the Red Sea coast is the main port to sail to this land, where the archaeologists discovered inscribed ostraca, well-preserved timber, limestone anchors, stelae recording seafaring expeditions to Punt. Structures associated with the stelae at Wadi Gawasis on the Red Sea coast provided the first archaeological evidence that the Egyptians were navigating in the Red Sea.

There are a lot of foreign materials had been discovered in this port including ship timbers, anchors, ropes, cargo boxes, administrative devices, ostraca, fragments of papyri, lithics, plant and animal remains and pottery (e.g. Ancient Ona ware, early Adulis ware from Eritrea, Gash Group ware and Nubian ware from the region of the 4th Cataract in Sudan, Malayba ware, and Sabir ware from Southern Arabia). In addition to raw materials, researchers found African ebony most likely from the northwestern slopes of the highlands in Eritrea, and obsidian (which did not analysed yet).

Fig.1: the location of Wadi Gawasis port, and the land of Punt. (Fattovich, 2012)

Obsidian is a natural volcanic glass of rhyolite composition (defined by a silica content of around 70% by weight). Due to its numerous qualities – physical and aesthetic – it is well known both as a luxury item and tool material throughout the prehistoric and historic world. Obsidian is the sharpest available raw material and is homogeneous in nature, making it easily workable and desirable as a tool of production. The ancient Egyptians used obsidian to inlay statue eyes, jewels, and amulets (Fig. 2). Geologically, there are no sources of obsidian in Egypt, while many obsidian sources documented on either side of the southern Red Sea (Fig. 3), near to the Land of Punt.

Fig. 2: Ancient Egyptian artifacts from obsidian, Suez National Museum.

The geochemical homogeneity of each obsidian source allows obsidian to be traceable back to its source at outcrop. This requires geochemical characterization of sources in order to establish the origins of obsidian artifacts. Chemical or mineralogical analysis samples of obsidian recently discovered from Wadi Gawasis port will help to determine its geochemical characterization in order to locating the source region, by comparing the results with numerous samples of obsidian collected and already analysed from both sides of southern Red Sea coasts, which will definitely shed new lights to find the location of the Land of Punt, or approve the current theory at least.

Fig. 3: The sources of obsidian in the southern Red Sea coasts. (Khalidi, 2010)

References                                                                                                 

Fattovich, R. (2012) “Egypt’s trade with Punt: New discoveries on the Red Sea coast”, British Museum Studies in Ancient Egypt and Sudan 18, 1–59.

Khalidi, L. (2010) “Holocene Obsidian Exchange in the Red Sea Region”, in The Evolution of Human Populations in Arabia: Paleoenvironments, Prehistory and Genetics, Petraglia, M. D., Rose, J. I., (eds.), Netherlands: Springer, 279-291.

Kitchen, K. (1971) “Punt and how to get there”, Orientalia 40,184–207.

Meeks, D. (2003) “Locating Punt”, in Mysterious Lands: encounters with ancient Egypt, O’Connor, D., Quirke, S., London: University College of London Press, 53–80.

Phillips, J. (1997) “Punt and Aksum: Egypt and the Horn of Africa”, the Journal of African History 38, 423-457

Sayed, A. M. (1978) “The recently discovered port on the Red Sea shore”, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 64, 69-71.

Wicker, F.D.P. (1998) “The road to Punt”, Geographical Journal 164, 45-56.

3 thoughts on “One More Geological Clue Still Pending; “The Obsidian of the Land of Punt”

  1. It would be interesting to know why is this obsidian so blue, there are no blue rhyolites or obsidian known to me. But I have googled it and the obsidian from Egypt has been described in many, many papers in the past. Nevertheless why is it blue? (a comment from the reviewer)

  2. Thanks for your comment, and sorry for the delay respond, I just saw it. Actually, the aim of this letter is Not to focus on the characterization of the obsidian from Wadi Gawasis as a raw material (that is because I am not geologist), but to pay the attention of the geologists to the foreign obsidian in Egypt, which was found with other imported materials from the Land of Punt, and as I present in the letter a lot of evidence assist in locating the Land of Punt, but the geological one still pending.
    for the colors of obsidian, the pure obsidian is usually dark in appearance, and the color varies depending on the presence of impurities. Iron and other transition elements may give the obsidian a dark brown to black color. Obsidian may contain patterns of gas bubbles remaining from the lava flow, aligned along layers created as the molten rock was flowing before being cooled. but why exactly this samples seems blue, I think the answer will depend on the the analysis.

  3. Thanks for your comment, and sorry for the delay respond, I just saw it. Actually, the aim of this letter is Not to focus on the characterization of the obsidian from Wadi Gawasis as a raw material (that is because I am not geologist), but to pay the attention of the geologists to the foreign obsidian in Egypt, which was found with other imported materials from the Land of Punt, and as I present in the letter a lot of evidence assisted in locating the Land of Punt, but the geological one still pending.
    for the colors of obsidian, the pure obsidian is usually dark in appearance, and the color varies depending on the presence of impurities. Iron and other transition elements may give the obsidian a dark brown to black color. Obsidian may contain patterns of gas bubbles remaining from the lava flow, aligned along layers created as the molten rock was flowing before being cooled. but Why exactly this samples seems blue, I think the answer will depend on the the analysis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *